Zac Efron provides the voice for a 12-year old boy who is in love with a girl, voiced by Taylor Swift. He wants to get her the perfect gift, and decides it should be a tree. That might not seem like a romantic gift, but where they live, there are no tree, or flowers, or grass, or anything organic besides the people. But in order to find a tree, he has to leave his town and travel to the land of The Lorax.

I'm optimistic about this film's chances for two reasons. Firstly, it is based on a book by Dr. Seuss and none of the recent films based on his books have flopped. (Cat in the Hat did reach $100 million, but it cost $109 million to make, so you could argue that one was a miss, but not an outright bomb.) Secondly, it is co-directed by the man who made Despicable Me, which made more than $250 million domestically and more than $500 million worldwide. Granted, that's not a guarantee this film will be a success, especially with its release date. But if early reviews are right, it could open with more than $50 million and finish with close to $200 million. Matching Horton Hears a Who is probably more likely and that should be enough to keep the studio happy and ensure another adaptation is given the greenlight.

Last Minute Update: Early reviews are very positive, as expected, and I'm a little more hopeful about the film's legs.

Three high school students Thomas Mann, Oliver Cooper and Jonathan Brown decide to throw a party in order to get a reputation. It gets out of hand. That's it for the plot.

Todd Phillips is the producer here, which helps explain why this film is being described as The Hangover, but for high school kids. It's also being described as a mix of Superbad and Jackass. However, while those films were all hits, this one will be lucky if it makes in total as much as Jackass 3D made during its opening weekend, as there is simply not enough buzz to predict it will be anything more than a midlevel hit. It only has one review on Rotten Tomatoes, but it is positive. On the other hand, I've seen a few reviews online that suggest the film's appeal will be very limited. They suggest that you really can judge this film by its trailer.

Last Minute Update: As more reviews come in, its Tomatometer Score has sunk. It feels like a movie aimed at people too young to see R-rated films.

This could be a disaster. John Carter stars Taylor Kitsch as a Civil War era soldier who finds a portal to Mars and becomes embroiled in a war there. It's based on the first of an elven-novel series written by Edgar Rice Burroughs and if it becomes a hit, Disney could have a franchise that lasts more than a decade. However, the buzz surrounding this movie is terrible and more people are talking about what films this movie reminds them of or the film's budget than whether or not it will be worth seeing. This isn't really fair, as the movie is based on a novel first written almost a century ago, so it isn't a rip-off of Star Wars, Avatar, etc. On the other hand, there are some definitely similarities that you can't deny and as I believe Friedrich Nietzsche said, "There is no reality only the perception of reality." If people think it is a rip-off, they will avoid it, even if they are wrong.

Speaking of the film's budget, it is rumored to be $250 million. The studio say that's ridiculous and that the film only cost half that. However, there are also rumors that with extensive re-shoots, the film actually cost much more than $250 million to complete. Unless this film is a massive hit, and by that I mean it opens with close to $70 million instead of finishes with $70 million, the studio is going to take a huge hit on this one.

This film is a remake of La Casa Muda, which is Spanish for The Silent House. That film cost just $6,000 to make but earned very good reviews and generated enough buzz that a Hollywood remake was practically inevitable. I'm a little surprised it took such a short period of time. The buzz for this film is rather quiet and I'm not 100% sure it will open wide. The distributor, Open Road, is very new and this is only their third film. It is also only the third film for the co-directors, Chris Kentis and Laura Lau. As for its star, Elizabeth Olsen, this is only her second theatrical release. However, since her first film, Martha Marcy May Marlene, earned her Oscar buzz, she is the biggest selling feature of the film. Will that be enough to be a midlevel hit? I don't know. However, if it really did cost as little as suspected, it won't need to be a midlevel hit for the studio to breakeven.

Last Minute Update: Early reviews are just starting to trickle in and while it is still too early to predict the film's final Tomatometer Score, so far it is at 100% positive. Not only that, but a lot of the positive reviews are enthusiastically positive. It will still need studio support to become anything more than a middling hit, but I'm bumping my prediction from $25 million to $35 million.

Eddie Murphy plays a literary agent who lies to everyone. But when he lies to a guru, Cliff Curtis, over a book deal, the guru curses him, giving him only a thousand words before he dies.

This movie was filmed in 2008, but for various reasons, it sat on a studio shelf for the past three years. Usually when this happens, it's because the film is terrible and the studio doesn't want to spend money on prints and advertising to release it. However, in this case, the film was caught up in the divorce between Paramount and DreamWorks. Perhaps it is a good movie that just got unlucky. Unfortunately, Eddie Murphy was on a losing streak with critics and moviegoers since this film was made, so perceptions are even more important and the release date dance might kill it before it has a chance. If the early reviews are bad, this film's box office chances will sink even lower.

Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum star as two bad cops (that's bad as in incompetent not bad as in corrupt). After screwing up a bust, they are sent to 21 Jump Street, a unit for cops that go undercover in high schools as students. Their first assignment is to figure out who is dealing a new designer drug and identify the supplier.

Like I said, most people in the target demographic for this movie weren't alive when the TV show debuted. This could explain why they decided to go the Starsky & Hutch route and instead of making a faithful adaptation, they made a Buddy Cop comedy that makes fun of the parts of the show that were taken too seriously the first time around. This does mean using 21 Jump Street's name won't be useful to sell the movie. I've seen a few early reviews and they are mostly positive. If you like Jonah Hill, you will likely enjoy this film. On the other hand, if you avoided The Sitter, this one probably won't interest you either. On the plus side, it does have the weekend all to itself, so that should help it top the chart during its opening.

Unless this film is all hype, The Hunger Games will become only the third film released by Lionsgate to reach $100 million, and there's a 50/50 chance it will become the studio's first film to top $200 million. On the 22nd of February, the film had advance sales and broke the one-day record, so a $75 million opening weekend is entirely within reach. The buzz surrounding this film is very loud and it is nearly 100% positive. The closest I've seen to real complaints are people debating who might have been a better casting choice for what role. The only downside with all of this buzz is that it sets up high expectations. If the reviews are merely good and not amazing, some people will be really disappointed.

This film is directed by Tarsem Singh, who previously made The Cell, The Fall, and Immortals. So you can expect a visual feast. On the other hand, it might be too visual to appeal to a mass audience. Or to put it another way, the visuals might overwhelm the basic storytelling to the point that it becomes hard to sell to a lot of people. I'm also getting a Red Riding Hood vibe, which is bad news, as that film only made $37 million. Finally, there is Snow White and the Huntsman, which is an adaptation of the same fairytale and comes out this summer. That film is the bigger movie, and while they won't compete directly for the same audience because the release dates are far enough apart, the comparisons might hurt both movies, as the air of unoriginality surrounds both of them.

Perseus has to rescue his father, who has been kidnapped by Hades and Ares and taken to hell.

Clash of the Titans earned a boatload of money back in 2010, so it is not surprising that a sequel was made. However, Clash also earned bad reviews and isn't remembered fondly by a lot of people. I don't expect Wrath of the Titans to match its predecessor, and it might not open in first place. (That depends heavily on how well The Hunger Games does during its debut the week before and how well it holds up.) It should still be a big enough hit that the studio will be happy, especially if it does proportionally as well on the international market. (Which would be $125 million domestically and $250 million internationally.)